Chunk 1: 数据层+输出解析(Task 1-11) Chunk 2: 事件集成+BPMN+行动分发(Task 12-19) Chunk 3: 闭环对比+前端展示(Task 20-25)
55 KiB
AI→行动闭环 实施计划
For agentic workers: REQUIRED: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (if subagents available) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan. Steps use checkbox (
- [ ]) syntax for tracking.
Goal: 实现 AI 分析结果到可执行行动的闭环系统——双通道输出、BPMN 编排分级自动化、前后对比评估。
Architecture: 在 erp-ai 中新增结构化输出解析层和 SuggestionService;扩展事件 payload 触发 erp-workflow BPMN 流程;erp-health 消费工作流事件执行随访/预约/预警行动。
Tech Stack: Rust / SeaORM / Axum / EventBus / BPMN (erp-workflow) / Handlebars / React + Ant Design
Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-01-ai-action-loop-design.md
文件变更总览
新建文件
| 文件 | 职责 |
|---|---|
crates/erp-ai/src/dto/suggestion.rs |
SuggestionType/RiskLevel/SuggestionStatus 枚举 + StructuredOutput/StructuredSuggestion DTO |
crates/erp-ai/src/service/suggestion.rs |
SuggestionService — CRUD + 状态流转 |
crates/erp-ai/src/service/output_parser.rs |
双通道输出解析(文本/JSON 分割 + Schema 校验) |
crates/erp-ai/src/service/local_rules.rs |
本地临床规则引擎(AI 不可用时回退) |
crates/erp-ai/src/entity/ai_suggestion.rs |
ai_suggestion 表 SeaORM Entity |
crates/erp-ai/src/entity/ai_risk_threshold.rs |
ai_risk_threshold 表 SeaORM Entity |
crates/erp-server/migration/src/m20260502_000098_create_ai_suggestion.rs |
ai_suggestion 表迁移 |
crates/erp-server/migration/src/m20260502_000099_create_ai_risk_threshold.rs |
ai_risk_threshold 表迁移 |
crates/erp-ai/src/handler/suggestion_handler.rs |
建议 CRUD API 端点 |
crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_action_dispatcher.rs |
AI 行动分发(风险分级 → 调用对应服务) |
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-01-ai-action-loop-plan-chunk2.md |
Chunk 2 计划(事件集成 + BPMN) |
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-01-ai-action-loop-plan-chunk3.md |
Chunk 3 计划(闭环对比 + 前端) |
修改文件
| 文件 | 变更 |
|---|---|
crates/erp-ai/src/dto.rs |
拆分为 dto/ 模块,保留原 AnalysisType 等 |
crates/erp-ai/src/entity/mod.rs |
添加新 entity 引用 |
crates/erp-ai/src/service/mod.rs |
添加新 service 引用 |
crates/erp-ai/src/handler/mod.rs |
build_sse_stream 调用 output_parser,扩展事件 payload |
crates/erp-ai/src/lib.rs |
添加 dto/suggestion re-export |
crates/erp-ai/src/module.rs |
注册新权限码和建议路由 |
crates/erp-ai/src/state.rs |
添加 suggestion service 到 AiState |
crates/erp-health/src/event.rs |
新增 ai.analysis.completed 消费者(行动分发) |
crates/erp-server/migration/src/lib.rs |
注册新迁移 |
crates/erp-server/src/main.rs |
初始化新 service、注册 seed 数据 |
Chunk 1: 数据层 + 输出解析(Phase 1)
Task 1: 新增 Suggestion 相关枚举和 DTO
Files:
-
Rename:
crates/erp-ai/src/dto.rs→crates/erp-ai/src/dto/mod.rs -
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/dto/suggestion.rs -
Step 0: 将 dto.rs 重构为 dto/ 目录模块
Rust 不允许同时存在 dto.rs 和 dto/ 目录。需要:
- 将
crates/erp-ai/src/dto.rs重命名为crates/erp-ai/src/dto/mod.rs - 在
dto/mod.rs底部添加pub mod suggestion;
- Step 1: 创建 suggestion DTO 文件
// crates/erp-ai/src/dto/suggestion.rs
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use uuid::Uuid;
/// 建议类型:随访 / 预约 / 预警
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
pub enum SuggestionType {
Followup,
Appointment,
Alert,
}
impl SuggestionType {
pub fn as_str(&self) -> &str {
match self {
Self::Followup => "followup",
Self::Appointment => "appointment",
Self::Alert => "alert",
}
}
}
/// 风险等级
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
pub enum RiskLevel {
Low,
Medium,
High,
}
impl RiskLevel {
pub fn as_str(&self) -> &str {
match self {
Self::Low => "low",
Self::Medium => "medium",
Self::High => "high",
}
}
/// 低风险可自动执行,其他需人工确认
pub fn is_auto_executable(&self) -> bool {
matches!(self, Self::Low)
}
}
/// 建议状态
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
pub enum SuggestionStatus {
Pending,
Approved,
Rejected,
Executed,
Expired,
ParseFailed,
}
impl SuggestionStatus {
pub fn as_str(&self) -> &str {
match self {
Self::Pending => "pending",
Self::Approved => "approved",
Self::Rejected => "rejected",
Self::Executed => "executed",
Self::Expired => "expired",
Self::ParseFailed => "parse_failed",
}
}
}
/// AI 输出的单条结构化建议
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct StructuredSuggestion {
pub id: Option<Uuid>,
#[serde(rename = "type")]
pub suggestion_type: SuggestionType,
pub priority: u32,
pub timing: String,
pub reason: String,
pub params: serde_json::Value,
#[serde(default)]
pub auto_executable: bool,
}
/// AI 双通道输出的结构化部分
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct StructuredOutput {
pub risk_level: RiskLevel,
pub risk_factors: Vec<String>,
pub suggestions: Vec<StructuredSuggestion>,
pub baseline_summary: serde_json::Value,
}
/// 解析后的双通道结果
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct ParsedOutput {
pub text_content: String,
pub structured: Option<StructuredOutput>,
}
- Step 2: 确认 lib.rs 不需要修改
lib.rs 已有 pub mod dto;,dto.rs → dto/mod.rs 重构后这行无需变化。
- Step 3: 编写枚举单元测试
在同一文件底部 #[cfg(test)] mod tests 中添加 SuggestionType/RiskLevel/SuggestionStatus 的序列化往返测试和 is_auto_executable 测试。
-
Step 4: 运行
cargo check -p erp-ai验证编译通过 -
Step 5: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/dto.rs crates/erp-ai/src/dto/
git commit -m "feat(ai): 新增 Suggestion/RiskLevel/SuggestionStatus 枚举和结构化输出 DTO"
Task 2: 数据库迁移 — ai_suggestion 表
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-server/migration/src/m20260502_000098_create_ai_suggestion.rs -
Modify:
crates/erp-server/migration/src/lib.rs -
Step 1: 创建迁移文件
// crates/erp-server/migration/src/m20260502_000098_create_ai_suggestion.rs
use sea_orm_migration::prelude::*;
#[derive(DeriveMigrationName)]
pub struct Migration;
#[async_trait::async_trait]
impl MigrationTrait for Migration {
async fn up(&self, manager: &SchemaManager) -> Result<(), DbErr> {
manager.create_table(
Table::create()
.table(Alias::new("ai_suggestion"))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("id"))
.uuid().not_null().primary_key()
.default(Expr::cust("gen_random_uuid()")))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("tenant_id")).uuid().not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("analysis_id")).uuid().not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("suggestion_type"))
.string_len(20).not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("risk_level"))
.string_len(10).not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("params"))
.json_binary().not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("status"))
.string_len(20).not_null().default("pending"))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("workflow_instance_id")).uuid())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("action_result")).json_binary())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("baseline_snapshot")).json_binary())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("reanalysis_id")).uuid())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("created_at"))
.timestamp_with_time_zone()
.default(Expr::cust("NOW()")))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("updated_at"))
.timestamp_with_time_zone()
.default(Expr::cust("NOW()")))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("created_by")).uuid())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("updated_by")).uuid())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("deleted_at"))
.timestamp_with_time_zone())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("version_lock"))
.integer().not_null().default(1))
.to_owned(),
).await?;
manager.create_index(
Index::create()
.name("idx_ai_suggestion_tenant_analysis")
.table(Alias::new("ai_suggestion"))
.col(Alias::new("tenant_id"))
.col(Alias::new("analysis_id"))
.to_owned(),
).await?;
manager.create_index(
Index::create()
.name("idx_ai_suggestion_tenant_status")
.table(Alias::new("ai_suggestion"))
.col(Alias::new("tenant_id"))
.col(Alias::new("status"))
.to_owned(),
).await?;
Ok(())
}
async fn down(&self, manager: &SchemaManager) -> Result<(), DbErr> {
manager.drop_table(
Table::drop().table(Alias::new("ai_suggestion")).to_owned()
).await
}
}
- Step 2: 在
lib.rs中注册迁移
在 crates/erp-server/migration/src/lib.rs 中:
-
添加
mod m20260502_000098_create_ai_suggestion; -
在
migrations()vec 中添加Box::new(m20260502_000098_create_ai_suggestion::Migration) -
Step 3: 运行
cargo check -p erp-server验证编译 -
Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-server/migration/src/
git commit -m "feat(db): 添加 ai_suggestion 表迁移"
Task 3: 数据库迁移 — ai_risk_threshold 表
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-server/migration/src/m20260502_000099_create_ai_risk_threshold.rs -
Modify:
crates/erp-server/migration/src/lib.rs -
Step 1: 创建迁移文件
// crates/erp-server/migration/src/m20260502_000099_create_ai_risk_threshold.rs
use sea_orm_migration::prelude::*;
#[derive(DeriveMigrationName)]
pub struct Migration;
#[async_trait::async_trait]
impl MigrationTrait for Migration {
async fn up(&self, manager: &SchemaManager) -> Result<(), DbErr> {
manager.create_table(
Table::create()
.table(Alias::new("ai_risk_threshold"))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("id"))
.uuid().not_null().primary_key()
.default(Expr::cust("gen_random_uuid()")))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("tenant_id")).uuid().not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("metric_name"))
.string_len(50).not_null())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("low_threshold"))
.json_binary())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("medium_threshold"))
.json_binary())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("high_threshold"))
.json_binary())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("created_at"))
.timestamp_with_time_zone()
.default(Expr::cust("NOW()")))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("updated_at"))
.timestamp_with_time_zone()
.default(Expr::cust("NOW()")))
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("created_by")).uuid())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("updated_by")).uuid())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("deleted_at"))
.timestamp_with_time_zone())
.col(ColumnDef::new(Alias::new("version_lock"))
.integer().not_null().default(1))
.to_owned(),
).await?;
manager.create_index(
Index::create()
.name("idx_ai_risk_threshold_tenant_metric")
.table(Alias::new("ai_risk_threshold"))
.col(Alias::new("tenant_id"))
.col(Alias::new("metric_name"))
.unique()
.to_owned(),
).await?;
Ok(())
}
async fn down(&self, manager: &SchemaManager) -> Result<(), DbErr> {
manager.drop_table(
Table::drop().table(Alias::new("ai_risk_threshold")).to_owned()
).await
}
}
-
Step 2: 在
lib.rs注册迁移 -
Step 3: 运行
cargo check -p erp-server验证 -
Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-server/migration/src/
git commit -m "feat(db): 添加 ai_risk_threshold 表迁移"
Task 4: SeaORM Entity — ai_suggestion + ai_risk_threshold
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/entity/ai_suggestion.rs -
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/entity/ai_risk_threshold.rs -
Modify:
crates/erp-ai/src/entity/mod.rs -
Step 1: 创建 ai_suggestion entity
// crates/erp-ai/src/entity/ai_suggestion.rs
use sea_orm::entity::prelude::*;
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, DeriveEntityModel, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[sea_orm(table_name = "ai_suggestion")]
pub struct Model {
#[sea_orm(primary_key, auto_increment = false)]
pub id: Uuid,
pub tenant_id: Uuid,
pub analysis_id: Uuid,
pub suggestion_type: String,
pub risk_level: String,
pub params: serde_json::Value,
pub status: String,
pub workflow_instance_id: Option<Uuid>,
pub action_result: Option<serde_json::Value>,
pub baseline_snapshot: Option<serde_json::Value>,
pub reanalysis_id: Option<Uuid>,
pub created_at: DateTimeUtc,
pub updated_at: DateTimeUtc,
pub created_by: Option<Uuid>,
pub updated_by: Option<Uuid>,
pub deleted_at: Option<DateTimeUtc>,
pub version_lock: i32,
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, EnumIter, DeriveRelation)]
pub enum Relation {}
impl ActiveModelBehavior for ActiveModel {}
- Step 2: 创建 ai_risk_threshold entity
// crates/erp-ai/src/entity/ai_risk_threshold.rs
use sea_orm::entity::prelude::*;
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, DeriveEntityModel, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[sea_orm(table_name = "ai_risk_threshold")]
pub struct Model {
#[sea_orm(primary_key, auto_increment = false)]
pub id: Uuid,
pub tenant_id: Uuid,
pub metric_name: String,
pub low_threshold: Option<serde_json::Value>,
pub medium_threshold: Option<serde_json::Value>,
pub high_threshold: Option<serde_json::Value>,
pub created_at: DateTimeUtc,
pub updated_at: DateTimeUtc,
pub created_by: Option<Uuid>,
pub updated_by: Option<Uuid>,
pub deleted_at: Option<DateTimeUtc>,
pub version_lock: i32,
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, EnumIter, DeriveRelation)]
pub enum Relation {}
impl ActiveModelBehavior for ActiveModel {}
- Step 3: 更新 entity/mod.rs
pub mod ai_analysis;
pub mod ai_prompt;
pub mod ai_risk_threshold;
pub mod ai_suggestion;
pub mod ai_usage;
-
Step 4: 运行
cargo check -p erp-ai验证 -
Step 5: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/entity/
git commit -m "feat(ai): 添加 ai_suggestion 和 ai_risk_threshold SeaORM Entity"
Task 5: 双通道输出解析器
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/service/output_parser.rs -
Step 1: 编写解析器测试(TDD RED)
// tests 在 output_parser.rs 底部 #[cfg(test)] mod tests
#[test]
fn parse_dual_channel_output_success() {
let raw = "===PATIENT_TEXT===\n张三的收缩压呈上升趋势\n===STRUCTURED_JSON===\n{\"risk_level\":\"medium\",\"risk_factors\":[\"收缩压偏高\"],\"suggestions\":[{\"type\":\"followup\",\"priority\":1,\"timing\":\"14天内\",\"reason\":\"血压异常\",\"params\":{},\"auto_executable\":false}],\"baseline_summary\":{}}";
let result = parse_dual_channel(raw).unwrap();
assert_eq!(result.text_content, "张三的收缩压呈上升趋势");
assert!(result.structured.is_some());
let s = result.structured.unwrap();
assert_eq!(s.risk_level, RiskLevel::Medium);
assert_eq!(s.suggestions.len(), 1);
}
#[test]
fn parse_text_only_fallback() {
let raw = "纯文本分析结果,没有结构化部分";
let result = parse_dual_channel(raw).unwrap();
assert_eq!(result.text_content, "纯文本分析结果,没有结构化部分");
assert!(result.structured.is_none());
}
#[test]
fn parse_invalid_json_falls_back() {
let raw = "===PATIENT_TEXT===\n分析内容\n===STRUCTURED_JSON===\n{invalid json}";
let result = parse_dual_channel(raw).unwrap();
assert_eq!(result.text_content, "分析内容");
assert!(result.structured.is_none()); // 降级
}
#[test]
fn empty_suggestions_is_valid() {
let raw = "===PATIENT_TEXT===\n指标正常\n===STRUCTURED_JSON===\n{\"risk_level\":\"low\",\"risk_factors\":[],\"suggestions\":[],\"baseline_summary\":{}}";
let result = parse_dual_channel(raw).unwrap();
let s = result.structured.unwrap();
assert!(s.suggestions.is_empty());
}
#[test]
fn risk_level_auto_executable() {
assert!(RiskLevel::Low.is_auto_executable());
assert!(!RiskLevel::Medium.is_auto_executable());
assert!(!RiskLevel::High.is_auto_executable());
}
- Step 2: 运行测试确认失败
cargo test -p erp-ai -- output_parser
Expected: 编译失败(函数不存在)
- Step 3: 实现解析器
// crates/erp-ai/src/service/output_parser.rs
use crate::dto::suggestion::{ParsedOutput, RiskLevel, StructuredOutput};
use crate::error::AiResult;
const TEXT_MARKER: &str = "===PATIENT_TEXT===";
const JSON_MARKER: &str = "===STRUCTURED_JSON===";
/// 解析 AI 双通道输出。JSON 解析失败时降级为纯文本。
pub fn parse_dual_channel(raw: &str) -> AiResult<ParsedOutput> {
let text_content = extract_section(raw, TEXT_MARKER, JSON_MARKER)
.unwrap_or(raw)
.trim()
.to_string();
let structured = extract_section(raw, JSON_MARKER, TEXT_MARKER)
.and_then(|json_str| {
let parsed: Result<StructuredOutput, _> =
serde_json::from_str(json_str.trim());
parsed.ok()
});
Ok(ParsedOutput {
text_content,
structured,
})
}
fn extract_section<'a>(raw: &'a str, start: &str, end: &str) -> Option<&'a str> {
let start_idx = raw.find(start)?;
let content_start = start_idx + start.len();
let content_end = raw[content_start..]
.find(end)
.map(|i| content_start + i)
.unwrap_or(raw.len());
Some(&raw[content_start..content_end])
}
- Step 4: 运行测试确认通过
cargo test -p erp-ai -- output_parser
Expected: 5 tests passed
- Step 5: 更新 service/mod.rs
pub mod analysis;
pub mod auto_analysis;
pub mod output_parser;
pub mod prompt;
pub mod usage;
- Step 6: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/service/output_parser.rs crates/erp-ai/src/service/mod.rs
git commit -m "feat(ai): 双通道输出解析器 — 文本/JSON 分割 + 降级策略"
Task 6: 本地临床规则引擎
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/service/local_rules.rs -
Step 1: 编写规则引擎测试(TDD RED)
#[test]
fn evaluate_systolic_bp_high() {
let rules = LocalRulesEngine::default_rules();
let metrics = json!({"systolic_bp": 165.0});
let suggestions = rules.evaluate(&metrics);
assert!(!suggestions.is_empty());
assert_eq!(suggestions[0].risk_level, RiskLevel::High);
}
#[test]
fn evaluate_all_normal_no_suggestions() {
let rules = LocalRulesEngine::default_rules();
let metrics = json!({"systolic_bp": 120.0, "heart_rate": 72.0, "blood_sugar": 5.5});
let suggestions = rules.evaluate(&metrics);
assert!(suggestions.is_empty());
}
#[test]
fn evaluate_missing_metric_skipped() {
let rules = LocalRulesEngine::default_rules();
let metrics = json!({"heart_rate": 110.0}); // 只有心率,无血压
let suggestions = rules.evaluate(&metrics);
assert!(suggestions.iter().any(|s| s.suggestion_type == SuggestionType::Alert));
}
-
Step 2: 运行测试确认失败
-
Step 3: 实现规则引擎
// crates/erp-ai/src/service/local_rules.rs
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use crate::dto::suggestion::{RiskLevel, SuggestionType, StructuredSuggestion};
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct LocalRule {
pub metric: String,
pub operator: CompareOp,
pub threshold: f64,
pub risk_level: RiskLevel,
pub suggestion_type: SuggestionType,
pub message_template: String,
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
pub enum CompareOp {
GreaterThan,
LessThan,
}
pub struct LocalRulesEngine {
rules: Vec<LocalRule>,
}
impl LocalRulesEngine {
pub fn new(rules: Vec<LocalRule>) -> Self {
Self { rules }
}
/// 预定义的临床规则
pub fn default_rules() -> Self {
Self::new(vec![
// 收缩压
LocalRule { metric: "systolic_bp".into(), operator: CompareOp::GreaterThan, threshold: 160.0, risk_level: RiskLevel::High, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Alert, message_template: "收缩压异常偏高({value}mmHg),请立即就医".into() },
LocalRule { metric: "systolic_bp".into(), operator: CompareOp::GreaterThan, threshold: 140.0, risk_level: RiskLevel::Medium, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Followup, message_template: "收缩压偏高({value}mmHg),建议2周内复查".into() },
LocalRule { metric: "systolic_bp".into(), operator: CompareOp::LessThan, threshold: 90.0, risk_level: RiskLevel::High, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Alert, message_template: "收缩压偏低({value}mmHg),请立即就医".into() },
// 心率
LocalRule { metric: "heart_rate".into(), operator: CompareOp::GreaterThan, threshold: 100.0, risk_level: RiskLevel::Medium, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Followup, message_template: "心率偏快({value}bpm),建议随访".into() },
LocalRule { metric: "heart_rate".into(), operator: CompareOp::LessThan, threshold: 60.0, risk_level: RiskLevel::Medium, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Followup, message_template: "心率偏慢({value}bpm),建议随访".into() },
// 血糖
LocalRule { metric: "blood_sugar".into(), operator: CompareOp::GreaterThan, threshold: 11.1, risk_level: RiskLevel::High, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Alert, message_template: "血糖异常偏高({value}mmol/L),请立即就医".into() },
LocalRule { metric: "blood_sugar".into(), operator: CompareOp::LessThan, threshold: 3.9, risk_level: RiskLevel::High, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Alert, message_template: "血糖偏低({value}mmol/L),有低血糖风险".into() },
// SpO2
LocalRule { metric: "spo2".into(), operator: CompareOp::LessThan, threshold: 95.0, risk_level: RiskLevel::High, suggestion_type: SuggestionType::Alert, message_template: "血氧饱和度偏低({value}%),请立即就医".into() },
])
}
pub fn evaluate(&self, metrics: &serde_json::Value) -> Vec<StructuredSuggestion> {
let mut suggestions = Vec::new();
for rule in &self.rules {
if let Some(value) = metrics.get(&rule.metric).and_then(|v| v.as_f64()) {
let triggered = match rule.operator {
CompareOp::GreaterThan => value > rule.threshold,
CompareOp::LessThan => value < rule.threshold,
};
if triggered {
suggestions.push(StructuredSuggestion {
id: None,
suggestion_type: rule.suggestion_type,
priority: match rule.risk_level {
RiskLevel::High => 1,
RiskLevel::Medium => 2,
RiskLevel::Low => 3,
},
timing: match rule.risk_level {
RiskLevel::High => "立即".into(),
RiskLevel::Medium => "2周内".into(),
RiskLevel::Low => "1个月内".into(),
},
reason: rule.message_template.replace("{value}", &value.to_string()),
params: serde_json::json!({
"metric": rule.metric,
"value": value,
"threshold": rule.threshold,
}),
auto_executable: rule.risk_level.is_auto_executable(),
});
}
}
}
suggestions.sort_by_key(|s| s.priority);
suggestions
}
}
- Step 4: 运行测试确认通过
cargo test -p erp-ai -- local_rules
-
Step 5: 更新 service/mod.rs 添加
pub mod local_rules; -
Step 6: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/service/local_rules.rs crates/erp-ai/src/service/mod.rs
git commit -m "feat(ai): 本地临床规则引擎 — AI 不可用时的回退方案"
Task 7: SuggestionService — CRUD + 状态流转
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/service/suggestion.rs -
Modify:
crates/erp-ai/src/state.rs -
Step 1: 实现 SuggestionService
// crates/erp-ai/src/service/suggestion.rs
use uuid::Uuid;
use sea_orm::{ActiveModelTrait, ColumnTrait, EntityTrait, QueryFilter, Set};
use erp_core::error::AppResult;
use crate::dto::suggestion::*;
use crate::entity::ai_suggestion;
pub struct SuggestionService;
impl SuggestionService {
/// 批量创建建议记录
pub async fn create_suggestions(
db: &sea_orm::DatabaseConnection,
tenant_id: Uuid,
analysis_id: Uuid,
suggestions: &[StructuredSuggestion],
risk_level: RiskLevel,
baseline_snapshot: &serde_json::Value,
created_by: Option<Uuid>,
) -> AppResult<Vec<uuid::Uuid>> {
let mut ids = Vec::new();
for s in suggestions {
let id = Uuid::now_v7();
let model = ai_suggestion::ActiveModel {
id: Set(id),
tenant_id: Set(tenant_id),
analysis_id: Set(analysis_id),
suggestion_type: Set(s.suggestion_type.as_str().to_string()),
risk_level: Set(risk_level.as_str().to_string()),
params: Set(s.params.clone()),
status: Set(SuggestionStatus::Pending.as_str().to_string()),
workflow_instance_id: Set(None),
action_result: Set(None),
baseline_snapshot: Set(Some(baseline_snapshot.clone())),
reanalysis_id: Set(None),
created_by: Set(created_by),
updated_by: Set(created_by),
..Default::default()
};
model.insert(db).await?;
ids.push(id);
}
Ok(ids)
}
/// 查询某次分析的所有建议
pub async fn list_by_analysis(
db: &sea_orm::DatabaseConnection,
tenant_id: Uuid,
analysis_id: Uuid,
) -> AppResult<Vec<ai_suggestion::Model>> {
let items = ai_suggestion::Entity::find()
.filter(ai_suggestion::Column::TenantId.eq(tenant_id))
.filter(ai_suggestion::Column::AnalysisId.eq(analysis_id))
.filter(ai_suggestion::Column::DeletedAt.is_null())
.all(db)
.await?;
Ok(items)
}
/// 更新建议状态(带乐观锁 + tenant_id 过滤)
pub async fn update_status(
db: &sea_orm::DatabaseConnection,
suggestion_id: Uuid,
tenant_id: Uuid,
new_status: SuggestionStatus,
updated_by: Option<Uuid>,
) -> AppResult<()> {
let item = ai_suggestion::Entity::find()
.filter(ai_suggestion::Column::Id.eq(suggestion_id))
.filter(ai_suggestion::Column::TenantId.eq(tenant_id))
.filter(ai_suggestion::Column::DeletedAt.is_null())
.one(db)
.await?
.ok_or_else(|| crate::error::AiError::AnalysisNotFound("建议不存在".into()))?;
let current_version = item.version_lock;
let mut active: ai_suggestion::ActiveModel = item.into();
active.status = Set(new_status.as_str().to_string());
active.updated_by = Set(updated_by);
active.version_lock = Set(current_version + 1);
// 乐观锁:WHERE version_lock = current_version
let result = active.update(db).await?;
Ok(())
}
/// 标记为解析失败
pub async fn mark_parse_failed(
db: &sea_orm::DatabaseConnection,
tenant_id: Uuid,
analysis_id: Uuid,
) -> AppResult<()> {
// 不创建建议记录,仅记录日志
tracing::warn!(
analysis_id = %analysis_id,
"AI 结构化输出解析失败,降级为纯文本"
);
Ok(())
}
}
- Step 2: 更新 AiState 添加 suggestion service
// crates/erp-ai/src/state.rs — 添加字段
pub suggestion: Arc<SuggestionService>,
-
Step 3: 更新 service/mod.rs 添加
pub mod suggestion; -
Step 4: 运行
cargo check -p erp-ai验证编译
注意:AiState 的构造处(erp-server/main.rs)也需要更新,先加 SuggestionService 的初始化。
- Step 5: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/service/suggestion.rs crates/erp-ai/src/state.rs crates/erp-ai/src/service/mod.rs
git commit -m "feat(ai): SuggestionService — 建议记录 CRUD + 状态流转"
Task 8: 集成到 Handler — build_sse_stream 解析结构化输出
Files:
-
Modify:
crates/erp-ai/src/handler/mod.rs -
Step 1: 修改 complete_analysis 逻辑
在 build_sse_stream 函数的完成回调中(约 line 500),在发布 ai.analysis.completed 事件之前,添加结构化输出解析:
// 在 complete_analysis 之后、发布事件之前
let parsed = crate::service::output_parser::parse_dual_channel(&full_content)?;
// 存储结构化输出到 result_metadata
if let Some(ref structured) = parsed.structured {
let metadata = serde_json::json!({
"structured_output": structured,
"has_suggestions": !structured.suggestions.is_empty(),
});
state.analysis.update_result_metadata(analysis_id, &metadata, &state.db).await?;
// 创建建议记录
if !structured.suggestions.is_empty() {
state.suggestion.create_suggestions(
&state.db,
tenant_id,
analysis_id,
&structured.suggestions,
structured.risk_level,
&structured.baseline_summary,
Some(user_id),
).await?;
}
} else {
// 解析失败,标记
state.suggestion.mark_parse_failed(&state.db, tenant_id, analysis_id).await?;
}
- Step 2: 扩展 ai.analysis.completed 事件 payload
在事件 payload 中添加 structured_output 和 risk_level:
// 修改事件 payload 构建处
let mut payload = serde_json::json!({
"analysis_id": analysis_id,
"analysis_type": analysis_type,
"patient_id": patient_id,
"doctor_id": user_id,
});
if let Some(ref structured) = parsed.structured {
payload["risk_level"] = json!(structured.risk_level.as_str());
payload["suggestion_count"] = json!(structured.suggestions.len());
}
-
Step 3: 运行
cargo check -p erp-ai验证 -
Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/handler/mod.rs
git commit -m "feat(ai): 集成双通道输出解析到 SSE handler — 自动创建建议记录"
Task 9: 建议 API 端点 + 权限注册
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/handler/suggestion_handler.rs -
Modify:
crates/erp-ai/src/module.rs -
Step 1: 创建建议查询 API
// crates/erp-ai/src/handler/suggestion_handler.rs
// 查询某次分析的建议列表 + 查询待审批建议 + 审批/拒绝操作
两个端点:
-
GET /ai/suggestions?analysis_id=xxx— 查看建议列表(权限:ai.suggestion.list) -
POST /ai/suggestions/{id}/approve— 批准/拒绝建议(权限:ai.suggestion.manage) -
Step 2: 注册新权限码到 module.rs
添加两个 PermissionDescriptor:
-
ai.suggestion.list— "查看 AI 建议" -
ai.suggestion.manage— "审批 AI 建议" -
Step 3: 注册新路由到 protected_routes
-
Step 4: 运行
cargo check -p erp-ai验证 -
Step 5: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/handler/suggestion_handler.rs crates/erp-ai/src/module.rs
git commit -m "feat(ai): 建议查询/审批 API 端点 + 权限注册"
Task 10: erp-server 初始化集成
Files:
-
Modify:
crates/erp-server/src/main.rs -
Step 1: 在 AiState 构造处添加 SuggestionService
找到 erp-server/src/main.rs 中构造 AiState 的位置,添加:
suggestion: Arc::new(SuggestionService),
-
Step 2: 运行
cargo check全 workspace 验证 -
Step 3: 运行
cargo test -p erp-ai确认所有测试通过 -
Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-server/src/main.rs
git commit -m "feat(server): 集成 SuggestionService 到 AiState 初始化"
Task 11: 端到端验证
- Step 1: 启动后端服务
cd crates/erp-server && cargo run
- Step 2: 验证迁移执行成功
docker exec erp-postgres psql -U erp -c "\dt ai_*"
Expected: ai_suggestion 和 ai_risk_threshold 表存在
- Step 3: 通过 Swagger UI 测试分析 API
POST /api/v1/ai/analyze/trends → 检查返回的 SSE 事件中是否包含结构化建议
- Step 4: 验证建议记录已创建
GET /api/v1/ai/suggestions?analysis_id=xxx → 应返回结构化建议列表
- Step 5: 推送所有提交
git push
Chunk 1 完成。下一步进入 Chunk 2(事件集成 + BPMN 流程定义 + 行动分发)。
Chunk 2: 事件集成 + BPMN 流程 + 行动分发(Phase 2)
Task 12: AI 行动分发服务
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_action_dispatcher.rs -
Step 1: 编写分发器测试(TDD RED)
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn route_low_risk_to_auto_execute() {
let decision = dispatch_decision(&RiskLevel::Low, &SuggestionType::Alert);
assert_eq!(decision.execution_mode, ExecutionMode::AutoExecute);
assert_eq!(decision.response_timeout, None);
}
#[test]
fn route_medium_risk_to_doctor_review() {
let decision = dispatch_decision(&RiskLevel::Medium, &SuggestionType::Followup);
assert_eq!(decision.execution_mode, ExecutionMode::DoctorReview);
assert_eq!(decision.response_timeout, Some(Duration::from_secs(86400))); // 24h
}
#[test]
fn route_high_risk_to_urgent_confirm() {
let decision = dispatch_decision(&RiskLevel::High, &SuggestionType::Alert);
assert_eq!(decision.execution_mode, ExecutionMode::UrgentConfirm);
assert_eq!(decision.response_timeout, Some(Duration::from_secs(14400))); // 4h
}
}
-
Step 2: 运行测试确认失败
-
Step 3: 实现行动分发器
// crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_action_dispatcher.rs
use std::time::Duration;
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use uuid::Uuid;
use sea_orm::DatabaseConnection;
use erp_core::error::AppResult;
use erp_core::events::EventBus;
/// 执行模式
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum ExecutionMode {
AutoExecute,
DoctorReview,
UrgentConfirm,
}
/// 分发决策
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct DispatchDecision {
pub execution_mode: ExecutionMode,
pub response_timeout: Option<Duration>,
}
/// 根据风险等级和建议类型生成执行决策
pub fn dispatch_decision(risk_level: &str, suggestion_type: &str) -> DispatchDecision {
match risk_level {
"low" => DispatchDecision {
execution_mode: ExecutionMode::AutoExecute,
response_timeout: None,
},
"medium" => DispatchDecision {
execution_mode: ExecutionMode::DoctorReview,
response_timeout: Some(Duration::from_secs(86400)), // 24h
},
"high" => DispatchDecision {
execution_mode: ExecutionMode::UrgentConfirm,
response_timeout: Some(Duration::from_secs(14400)), // 4h
},
_ => DispatchDecision {
execution_mode: ExecutionMode::DoctorReview,
response_timeout: Some(Duration::from_secs(86400)),
},
}
}
/// 处理 AI 建议事件:根据风险等级分发到不同执行路径
pub async fn handle_ai_suggestions(
db: &DatabaseConnection,
event_bus: &EventBus,
tenant_id: Uuid,
analysis_id: Uuid,
patient_id: Uuid,
doctor_id: Option<Uuid>,
suggestions: &[serde_json::Value],
risk_level: &str,
) -> AppResult<()> {
for suggestion in suggestions {
let suggestion_type = suggestion["type"].as_str().unwrap_or("alert");
let decision = dispatch_decision(risk_level, suggestion_type);
match decision.execution_mode {
ExecutionMode::AutoExecute => {
execute_action(db, event_bus, tenant_id, patient_id, suggestion_type, suggestion).await?;
}
ExecutionMode::DoctorReview | ExecutionMode::UrgentConfirm => {
create_pending_action(
db, event_bus, tenant_id, patient_id, doctor_id,
suggestion_type, suggestion, risk_level, &decision,
).await?;
}
}
}
Ok(())
}
async fn execute_action(
db: &DatabaseConnection,
event_bus: &EventBus,
tenant_id: Uuid,
patient_id: Uuid,
action_type: &str,
params: &serde_json::Value,
) -> AppResult<()> {
match action_type {
"alert" => {
// 直接发送预警通知
let event = erp_core::events::DomainEvent::new(
"health.ai_alert.sent",
tenant_id,
serde_json::json!({
"patient_id": patient_id,
"alert_type": "ai_risk_warning",
"severity": params.get("severity").and_then(|v| v.as_str()).unwrap_or("warning"),
"message": params.get("message").and_then(|v| v.as_str()).unwrap_or(""),
"source": "ai_analysis",
}),
);
event_bus.publish(event, db).await?;
}
"followup" | "appointment" => {
// 低风险的随访/预约也可以自动创建,但仍通知医生
let event = erp_core::events::DomainEvent::new(
"health.ai_action.auto_executed",
tenant_id,
serde_json::json!({
"patient_id": patient_id,
"action_type": action_type,
"params": params,
}),
);
event_bus.publish(event, db).await?;
}
_ => {}
}
Ok(())
}
async fn create_pending_action(
db: &DatabaseConnection,
event_bus: &EventBus,
tenant_id: Uuid,
patient_id: Uuid,
doctor_id: Option<Uuid>,
action_type: &str,
params: &serde_json::Value,
risk_level: &str,
decision: &DispatchDecision,
) -> AppResult<()> {
let event = erp_core::events::DomainEvent::new(
"health.ai_action.pending_approval",
tenant_id,
serde_json::json!({
"patient_id": patient_id,
"doctor_id": doctor_id,
"action_type": action_type,
"risk_level": risk_level,
"timeout_seconds": decision.response_timeout.map(|d| d.as_secs()),
"params": params,
}),
);
event_bus.publish(event, db).await?;
Ok(())
}
-
Step 4: 运行测试确认通过
-
Step 5: 提交
git add crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_action_dispatcher.rs
git commit -m "feat(health): AI 行动分发器 — 风险分级路由到自动执行/医生审批/紧急确认"
Task 13: erp-health 事件消费者 — 订阅 ai.analysis.completed
Files:
-
Modify:
crates/erp-health/src/event.rs -
Step 1: 在 register_handlers_with_state 中新增消费者
在 crates/erp-health/src/event.rs 的 register_handlers_with_state 函数中,在已有的 ai.analysis.completed 通知消费者之后,新增行动分发消费者:
// 在现有的 ai_analysis_notifier 消费者之后
// AI→行动闭环消费者
let action_db = state.db.clone();
let action_event_bus = state.event_bus.clone();
let (mut ai_action_rx, ai_action_handle) = event_bus.subscribe_filtered("ai.analysis.".to_string());
tokio::spawn(async move {
while let Some(event) = ai_action_rx.recv().await {
if event.event_type != "ai.analysis.completed" { continue; }
let consumer_id = "ai_action_dispatcher";
if let Ok(true) = erp_core::events::is_event_processed(&action_db, event.id, consumer_id).await {
continue;
}
let tenant_id = event.tenant_id;
let payload = &event.payload;
let analysis_id = payload.get("analysis_id").and_then(|v| v.as_str()).unwrap_or("");
let patient_id = payload.get("patient_id").and_then(|v| v.as_str()).unwrap_or("");
let doctor_id = payload.get("doctor_id").and_then(|v| v.as_str());
let risk_level = payload.get("risk_level").and_then(|v| v.as_str()).unwrap_or("medium");
let suggestion_count = payload.get("suggestion_count").and_then(|v| v.as_u64()).unwrap_or(0);
// 只有有建议时才触发行动分发
if suggestion_count > 0 {
// 从 ai_suggestion 表加载建议列表
if let Ok(suggestions) = crate::service::ai_suggestion_loader::load_by_analysis(
&action_db, tenant_id, analysis_id
).await {
let _ = crate::service::ai_action_dispatcher::handle_ai_suggestions(
&action_db,
&action_event_bus,
tenant_id,
analysis_id.parse().unwrap_or_default(),
patient_id.parse().unwrap_or_default(),
doctor_id.and_then(|s| s.parse().ok()),
&suggestions,
risk_level,
).await;
}
}
let _ = erp_core::events::mark_event_processed(&action_db, event.id, consumer_id).await;
}
});
- Step 2: 创建建议加载辅助函数
在 crates/erp-health/src/service/ 中新建 ai_suggestion_loader.rs,从 erp-ai 的 ai_suggestion 表读取建议列表:
// 通过 raw SQL 跨 crate 读取 ai_suggestion 表
pub async fn load_by_analysis(
db: &DatabaseConnection,
tenant_id: Uuid,
analysis_id: &str,
) -> AppResult<Vec<serde_json::Value>> {
// 使用 sea_orm raw query 从 ai_suggestion 表查询
// ...
}
-
Step 3: 运行
cargo check -p erp-health验证 -
Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-health/src/event.rs crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_suggestion_loader.rs
git commit -m "feat(health): 订阅 ai.analysis.completed — 行动分发事件消费者"
Task 14: BPMN 流程定义 — 审计前置条件
前置条件: Spec 要求 Phase 2 启动前审计 erp-workflow BPMN 功能覆盖度。
- Step 1: 审计 erp-workflow 支持的能力
检查 crates/erp-workflow/src/engine/ 和 dto.rs:
-
ExclusiveGateway— 条件分支:确认支持 -
UserTask— 医生审批节点:确认支持 -
ServiceTask— HTTP 调用节点:确认支持 -
定时器边界事件:检查
timeout.rs支持情况 -
信号事件:检查是否支持
-
Step 2: 评估审计结果
如果所有能力已支持 → 继续 Task 15-17 如果关键能力缺失 → 回退到 Task 15-alt(Action Registry 模式,不依赖 BPMN)
Task 15: BPMN 流程定义 — AI 随访流程
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-server/src/seed/ai_followup_workflow.rs(或通过 API seed) -
Reference:
crates/erp-workflow/src/service/definition_service.rs -
Step 1: 定义随访流程 JSON
通过 DefinitionService::create() API 创建流程定义。节点设计:
StartEvent → ExclusiveGateway(风险分级)
→ [low] → ServiceTask(自动创建随访) → EndEvent
→ [medium] → UserTask(医生审批) → [approve] → ServiceTask(创建随访) → EndEvent
→ [reject] → EndEvent
→ [high] → UserTask(紧急确认, 4h超时) → [confirm] → ServiceTask(创建随访) → EndEvent
→ [reject] → EndEvent
→ [timeout] → ServiceTask(升级通知) → EndEvent
- Step 2: 通过 seed 或 migration 插入流程定义
在 erp-server/src/main.rs 启动时检查是否存在 ai_followup_workflow 流程定义,不存在则创建。
- Step 3: 提交
git add crates/erp-server/src/seed/ai_followup_workflow.rs crates/erp-server/src/main.rs
git commit -m "feat(workflow): AI 随访流程 BPMN 定义 — 风险分级 + 医生审批 + 自动创建"
Task 16: BPMN 流程定义 — AI 预约流程
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-server/src/seed/ai_appointment_workflow.rs -
Step 1: 定义预约流程 JSON
StartEvent → ExclusiveGateway(风险分级)
→ [low] → ServiceTask(推荐预约时段) → EndEvent
→ [medium] → UserTask(医生确认时段) → ServiceTask(创建预约) → EndEvent
→ [high] → UserTask(紧急预约, 4h超时) → ServiceTask(创建预约) → EndEvent
-
Step 2: Seed 到数据库
-
Step 3: 提交
git add crates/erp-server/src/seed/ai_appointment_workflow.rs crates/erp-server/src/main.rs
git commit -m "feat(workflow): AI 预约流程 BPMN 定义 — 智能时段推荐"
Task 17: BPMN 流程定义 — AI 预警流程
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-server/src/seed/ai_alert_workflow.rs -
Step 1: 定义预警流程 JSON
StartEvent → ExclusiveGateway(风险分级)
→ [low] → ServiceTask(双通道发送通知) → EndEvent
→ [medium] → ServiceTask(推送给医生) → UserTask(24h响应) → EndEvent
→ [timeout] → ServiceTask(自动提醒) → EndEvent
→ [high] → ServiceTask(即时推送+仪表盘标红) → UserTask(4h确认) → EndEvent
→ [timeout] → ServiceTask(升级上级) → EndEvent
-
Step 2: Seed 到数据库
-
Step 3: 提交
git add crates/erp-server/src/seed/ai_alert_workflow.rs crates/erp-server/src/main.rs
git commit -m "feat(workflow): AI 预警流程 BPMN 定义 — 分级通知+超时升级"
Task 18: 行动分发 → 工作流启动集成
Files:
-
Modify:
crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_action_dispatcher.rs -
Step 1: 在分发器中集成工作流启动
在 create_pending_action 和需要审批的路径中,调用 InstanceService::start() 启动对应的 BPMN 流程实例:
// 根据 suggestion_type 选择流程定义 key
let workflow_key = match action_type {
"followup" => "ai_followup_workflow",
"appointment" => "ai_appointment_workflow",
"alert" => "ai_alert_workflow",
_ => return Ok(()),
};
// 通过 event 触发工作流启动(解耦,不直接依赖 erp-workflow)
let event = erp_core::events::DomainEvent::new(
"workflow.ai_action.start_requested",
tenant_id,
serde_json::json!({
"workflow_key": workflow_key,
"patient_id": patient_id,
"doctor_id": doctor_id,
"risk_level": risk_level,
"action_type": action_type,
"params": params,
}),
);
event_bus.publish(event, db).await?;
- Step 2: 在 erp-workflow 事件处理器中消费启动请求
在 crates/erp-workflow/src/module.rs 的事件注册中,新增 workflow.ai_action.start_requested 消费者,调用 InstanceService::start()。
-
Step 3: 运行
cargo check全 workspace 验证 -
Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-health/src/service/ai_action_dispatcher.rs crates/erp-workflow/src/module.rs
git commit -m "feat(health+workflow): 行动分发→工作流启动集成 — 事件驱动 BPMN 实例化"
Task 19: Chunk 2 端到端验证
- Step 1: 启动后端服务
cd crates/erp-server && cargo run
- Step 2: 触发 AI 分析
POST /api/v1/ai/analyze/trends → 确认结构化建议已创建
- Step 3: 验证事件链
检查日志确认:
-
ai.analysis.completed事件已发布 -
health.ai_action.pending_approval或health.ai_alert.sent事件已触发 -
BPMN 流程实例已创建
-
Step 4: 验证医生审批
通过 Task API 完成医生审批任务,确认随访/预约已创建
- Step 5: 推送
git push
Chunk 2 完成。下一步进入 Chunk 3(闭环对比 + 前端展示)。
Chunk 3: 闭环对比 + 前端展示(Phase 3-4)
Task 20: 随访完成 → 再分析触发
Files:
-
Modify:
crates/erp-health/src/event.rs -
Step 1: 扩展 follow_up.completed 事件消费
在现有的 follow_up.completed 事件处理中,检查该随访是否由 AI 建议触发(通过 follow_up_task 的 content_template 字段包含 ai_suggestion_id 判断):
// 在 follow_up.completed 消费者中添加
if let Some(ai_suggestion_id) = extract_ai_suggestion_id(&task) {
// 发布再分析请求
let event = erp_core::events::DomainEvent::new(
"ai.reanalysis.requested",
tenant_id,
serde_json::json!({
"original_suggestion_id": ai_suggestion_id,
"patient_id": task.patient_id,
"followup_id": task.id,
"trigger": "loop_closure",
}),
);
event_bus.publish(event, db).await?;
}
- Step 2: 在 erp-ai 中消费再分析请求
在 crates/erp-ai/src/handler/mod.rs 或独立的再分析服务中,订阅 ai.reanalysis.requested 事件:
- 加载原始建议的
baseline_snapshot - 提取随访期间的新数据
- 执行趋势分析(带 baseline)
- 生成对比报告
- Step 3: 提交
git add crates/erp-health/src/event.rs crates/erp-ai/src/service/reanalysis.rs
git commit -m "feat(health+ai): 随访完成→再分析触发 — 闭环核心链路"
Task 21: 前后对比报告生成
Files:
-
Create:
crates/erp-ai/src/service/comparison.rs -
Step 1: 实现对比报告生成
// crates/erp-ai/src/service/comparison.rs
pub struct ComparisonReport {
pub baseline: serde_json::Value,
pub current: serde_json::Value,
pub changes: Vec<MetricChange>,
pub overall_trend: TrendDirection,
}
pub struct MetricChange {
pub metric: String,
pub baseline_value: f64,
pub current_value: f64,
pub change_percent: f64,
pub trend: TrendDirection,
}
pub enum TrendDirection { Improving, Stable, Worsening }
pub fn generate_comparison(
baseline: &serde_json::Value,
current: &serde_json::Value,
) -> ComparisonReport {
// 对比 baseline_summary 和当前指标
// 计算每个指标的变化百分比和趋势方向
// 综合判断整体趋势
}
- Step 2: 在再分析流程中调用对比生成
再分析完成后,调用 generate_comparison() 生成对比报告,存储到 ai_analysis.result_metadata 中,关联到原始建议的 reanalysis_id。
- Step 3: 新增对比报告 API 端点
GET /ai/suggestions/{id}/comparison — 返回前后对比报告
- Step 4: 提交
git add crates/erp-ai/src/service/comparison.rs
git commit -m "feat(ai): 前后对比报告生成 — 闭环效果评估"
Task 22: Web 前端 — AI 建议面板
Files:
-
Modify:
apps/web/src/pages/health/AiAnalysisList.tsx -
Step 1: 在分析详情展开行中增加建议面板
在 AiAnalysisList.tsx 的展开行中,当分析有结构化建议时:
-
显示风险等级标签(低/中/高,不同颜色)
-
显示建议列表(类型图标 + 原因 + 状态标签)
-
显示执行状态(待审批/已批准/已执行/已拒绝)
-
Step 2: 添加建议审批操作按钮
对中/高风险建议,显示「批准」/「拒绝」按钮,调用 POST /api/v1/ai/suggestions/{id}/approve
- Step 3: 提交
git add apps/web/src/pages/health/AiAnalysisList.tsx
git commit -m "feat(web): AI 分析详情增加建议面板 — 风险等级+建议列表+审批操作"
Task 23: Web 前端 — 医生 AI 待办区域
Files:
-
Modify:
apps/web/src/pages/health/PatientDetail.tsx(或新建 Dashboard widget) -
Step 1: 在患者详情页添加 AI 待办区域
显示该患者待审批的 AI 建议,按风险等级排序,显示倒计时(中/高风险有超时)
- Step 2: 添加前后对比报告展示
当建议有闭环对比报告时,显示前后指标变化趋势图
- Step 3: 提交
git add apps/web/src/pages/health/PatientDetail.tsx
git commit -m "feat(web): 患者 AI 待办区域 + 前后对比趋势图"
Task 24: 小程序 — AI 建议卡片 + 预警通知
Files:
-
Modify:
apps/miniprogram/src/pages/health/index.tsx -
Modify:
apps/miniprogram/src/services/ai-analysis.ts -
Step 1: 健康页增加 AI 建议卡片
在健康页面顶部显示最新的 AI 建议摘要卡片:
-
风险等级颜色标签
-
建议文字摘要
-
点击跳转详情页
-
Step 2: 消息页增加风险预警通知类型
在消息页面中识别 AI 预警通知,用醒目样式显示
- Step 3: 提交
git add apps/miniprogram/src/pages/health/index.tsx apps/miniprogram/src/services/ai-analysis.ts
git commit -m "feat(miniprogram): AI 建议卡片 + 风险预警通知"
Task 25: 全流程端到端验证
- Step 1: 启动全栈服务
cd crates/erp-server && cargo run
cd apps/web && pnpm dev
- Step 2: 完整闭环测试
- 发起 AI 趋势分析 → 确认结构化建议生成
- 医生在 Web 端审批建议 → 确认随访计划已创建
- 患者小程序查看 AI 建议卡片 → 确认显示正常
- 模拟随访完成 → 确认再分析触发
- 查看前后对比报告 → 确认趋势对比正确
- Step 3: 运行全量测试
cargo check
cargo test --workspace
pnpm --filter web build
- Step 4: 最终推送
git push
计划完成。 共 25 个 Task,分 3 个 Chunk:
- Chunk 1 (Task 1-11): 数据层 + 输出解析 — 可独立执行
- Chunk 2 (Task 12-19): 事件集成 + BPMN + 行动分发 — 依赖 Chunk 1
- Chunk 3 (Task 20-25): 闭环对比 + 前端展示 — 依赖 Chunk 2