feat: integrate DevQALoop into TeamOrchestrator and add integration test checklist
- Add Review tab to TeamOrchestrator with DevQALoopPanel integration - Create comprehensive integration test checklist (22 test cases) - Document component integration status analysis - Update progress documentation Key findings: - Most "low integration" components were actually integrated via indirect paths - DevQALoop was the only truly unintegrated component, now fixed Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
iven
@@ -21,10 +21,11 @@ mod secure_storage;
|
||||
use serde::Serialize;
|
||||
use serde_json::{json, Value};
|
||||
use std::fs;
|
||||
use std::net::{TcpStream, ToSocketAddrs};
|
||||
use std::path::PathBuf;
|
||||
use std::process::Command;
|
||||
use std::thread;
|
||||
use std::time::Duration;
|
||||
use std::time::{Duration, Instant, SystemTime, UNIX_EPOCH};
|
||||
use tauri::{AppHandle, Manager};
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Serialize)]
|
||||
@@ -945,6 +946,299 @@ fn openfang_version(app: AppHandle) -> Result<VersionResponse, String> {
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// Health Check Commands
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Health status enum
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[serde(rename_all = "lowercase")]
|
||||
enum HealthStatus {
|
||||
Healthy,
|
||||
Unhealthy,
|
||||
Unknown,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Port check result
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
|
||||
struct PortCheckResult {
|
||||
port: u16,
|
||||
accessible: bool,
|
||||
latency_ms: Option<u64>,
|
||||
error: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Process health details
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
|
||||
struct ProcessHealthDetails {
|
||||
pid: Option<u32>,
|
||||
name: Option<String>,
|
||||
status: Option<String>,
|
||||
uptime_seconds: Option<u64>,
|
||||
cpu_percent: Option<f64>,
|
||||
memory_mb: Option<f64>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Health check response
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
|
||||
struct HealthCheckResponse {
|
||||
status: HealthStatus,
|
||||
process: ProcessHealthDetails,
|
||||
port_check: PortCheckResult,
|
||||
last_check_timestamp: u64,
|
||||
checks_performed: Vec<String>,
|
||||
issues: Vec<String>,
|
||||
runtime_source: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check if a TCP port is accessible
|
||||
fn check_port_accessibility(host: &str, port: u16, timeout_ms: u64) -> PortCheckResult {
|
||||
let addr = format!("{}:{}", host, port);
|
||||
|
||||
// Resolve the address
|
||||
let socket_addr = match addr.to_socket_addrs() {
|
||||
Ok(mut addrs) => addrs.next(),
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
return PortCheckResult {
|
||||
port,
|
||||
accessible: false,
|
||||
latency_ms: None,
|
||||
error: Some(format!("Failed to resolve address: {}", e)),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let Some(socket_addr) = socket_addr else {
|
||||
return PortCheckResult {
|
||||
port,
|
||||
accessible: false,
|
||||
latency_ms: None,
|
||||
error: Some("Failed to resolve address".to_string()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to connect with timeout
|
||||
let start = Instant::now();
|
||||
|
||||
// Use a simple TCP connect with timeout simulation
|
||||
let result = TcpStream::connect_timeout(&socket_addr, Duration::from_millis(timeout_ms));
|
||||
|
||||
match result {
|
||||
Ok(_) => {
|
||||
let latency = start.elapsed().as_millis() as u64;
|
||||
PortCheckResult {
|
||||
port,
|
||||
accessible: true,
|
||||
latency_ms: Some(latency),
|
||||
error: None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(e) => PortCheckResult {
|
||||
port,
|
||||
accessible: false,
|
||||
latency_ms: None,
|
||||
error: Some(format!("Connection failed: {}", e)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Get process uptime from status command
|
||||
fn get_process_uptime(status: &LocalGatewayStatus) -> Option<u64> {
|
||||
// Try to extract uptime from raw status data
|
||||
status
|
||||
.raw
|
||||
.get("process")
|
||||
.and_then(|p| p.get("uptimeSeconds"))
|
||||
.and_then(Value::as_u64)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Perform comprehensive health check on OpenFang Kernel
|
||||
#[tauri::command]
|
||||
fn openfang_health_check(
|
||||
app: AppHandle,
|
||||
port: Option<u16>,
|
||||
timeout_ms: Option<u64>,
|
||||
) -> Result<HealthCheckResponse, String> {
|
||||
let check_port = port.unwrap_or(OPENFANG_DEFAULT_PORT);
|
||||
let timeout = timeout_ms.unwrap_or(3000);
|
||||
let mut checks_performed = Vec::new();
|
||||
let mut issues = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// Get current timestamp
|
||||
let last_check_timestamp = SystemTime::now()
|
||||
.duration_since(UNIX_EPOCH)
|
||||
.map(|d| d.as_secs())
|
||||
.unwrap_or(0);
|
||||
|
||||
// 1. Check if OpenFang CLI is available
|
||||
let runtime = resolve_openfang_runtime(&app);
|
||||
let cli_available = runtime.executable.is_file();
|
||||
|
||||
if !cli_available {
|
||||
return Ok(HealthCheckResponse {
|
||||
status: HealthStatus::Unhealthy,
|
||||
process: ProcessHealthDetails {
|
||||
pid: None,
|
||||
name: None,
|
||||
status: None,
|
||||
uptime_seconds: None,
|
||||
cpu_percent: None,
|
||||
memory_mb: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
port_check: PortCheckResult {
|
||||
port: check_port,
|
||||
accessible: false,
|
||||
latency_ms: None,
|
||||
error: Some("OpenFang CLI not available".to_string()),
|
||||
},
|
||||
last_check_timestamp,
|
||||
checks_performed: vec!["cli_availability".to_string()],
|
||||
issues: vec![format!(
|
||||
"OpenFang runtime not found at: {}",
|
||||
runtime.display_path.display()
|
||||
)],
|
||||
runtime_source: Some(runtime.source),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
checks_performed.push("cli_availability".to_string());
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Get gateway status
|
||||
let gateway_status = read_gateway_status(&app)?;
|
||||
checks_performed.push("gateway_status".to_string());
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for configuration issues
|
||||
if !gateway_status.config_ok {
|
||||
issues.push("Gateway configuration has issues".to_string());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Check port accessibility
|
||||
let port_check = check_port_accessibility("127.0.0.1", check_port, timeout);
|
||||
checks_performed.push("port_accessibility".to_string());
|
||||
|
||||
if !port_check.accessible {
|
||||
issues.push(format!(
|
||||
"Port {} is not accessible: {}",
|
||||
check_port,
|
||||
port_check.error.as_deref().unwrap_or("unknown error")
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 4. Extract process information
|
||||
let process_health = if !gateway_status.listener_pids.is_empty() {
|
||||
// Get the first listener PID
|
||||
let pid = gateway_status.listener_pids[0];
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to get detailed process info from process list
|
||||
let process_info = run_openfang(&app, &["process", "list", "--json"])
|
||||
.ok()
|
||||
.and_then(|result| parse_json_output(&result.stdout).ok())
|
||||
.and_then(|json| json.get("processes").and_then(Value::as_array).cloned());
|
||||
|
||||
let (cpu, memory, uptime) = if let Some(ref processes) = process_info {
|
||||
let matching = processes
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|p| p.get("pid").and_then(Value::as_u64) == Some(pid as u64));
|
||||
|
||||
matching.map_or((None, None, None), |p| {
|
||||
(
|
||||
p.get("cpuPercent").and_then(Value::as_f64),
|
||||
p.get("memoryMb").and_then(Value::as_f64),
|
||||
p.get("uptimeSeconds").and_then(Value::as_u64),
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
(None, None, get_process_uptime(&gateway_status))
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
ProcessHealthDetails {
|
||||
pid: Some(pid),
|
||||
name: Some("openfang".to_string()),
|
||||
status: Some(
|
||||
gateway_status
|
||||
.service_status
|
||||
.clone()
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| "running".to_string()),
|
||||
),
|
||||
uptime_seconds: uptime,
|
||||
cpu_percent: cpu,
|
||||
memory_mb: memory,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ProcessHealthDetails {
|
||||
pid: None,
|
||||
name: None,
|
||||
status: gateway_status.service_status.clone(),
|
||||
uptime_seconds: None,
|
||||
cpu_percent: None,
|
||||
memory_mb: None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if process is running but no listeners
|
||||
if gateway_status.service_status.as_deref() == Some("running")
|
||||
&& gateway_status.listener_pids.is_empty()
|
||||
{
|
||||
issues.push("Service reports running but no listener processes found".to_string());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 5. Determine overall health status
|
||||
let status = if !cli_available {
|
||||
HealthStatus::Unhealthy
|
||||
} else if !port_check.accessible {
|
||||
HealthStatus::Unhealthy
|
||||
} else if gateway_status.listener_pids.is_empty() {
|
||||
HealthStatus::Unhealthy
|
||||
} else if !issues.is_empty() {
|
||||
// Has some issues but core functionality is working
|
||||
HealthStatus::Healthy
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
HealthStatus::Healthy
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(HealthCheckResponse {
|
||||
status,
|
||||
process: process_health,
|
||||
port_check,
|
||||
last_check_timestamp,
|
||||
checks_performed,
|
||||
issues,
|
||||
runtime_source: Some(runtime.source),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Quick ping to check if OpenFang is alive (lightweight check)
|
||||
#[tauri::command]
|
||||
fn openfang_ping(app: AppHandle) -> Result<bool, String> {
|
||||
let port_check = check_port_accessibility("127.0.0.1", OPENFANG_DEFAULT_PORT, 1000);
|
||||
|
||||
if port_check.accessible {
|
||||
return Ok(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Fallback: check via status command
|
||||
match run_openfang(&app, &["gateway", "status", "--json", "--no-probe"]) {
|
||||
Ok(result) => {
|
||||
if let Ok(status) = parse_json_output(&result.stdout) {
|
||||
// Check if there are any listener PIDs
|
||||
let has_listeners = status
|
||||
.get("port")
|
||||
.and_then(|p| p.get("listeners"))
|
||||
.and_then(Value::as_array)
|
||||
.map(|arr| !arr.is_empty())
|
||||
.unwrap_or(false);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(has_listeners)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(_) => Ok(false),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// Backward-compatible aliases (OpenClaw naming)
|
||||
// These delegate to OpenFang commands for backward compatibility
|
||||
@@ -1013,10 +1307,14 @@ pub fn run() {
|
||||
openfang_prepare_for_tauri,
|
||||
openfang_approve_device_pairing,
|
||||
openfang_doctor,
|
||||
openfang_health_check,
|
||||
// Process monitoring commands
|
||||
openfang_process_list,
|
||||
openfang_process_logs,
|
||||
openfang_version,
|
||||
// Health check commands
|
||||
openfang_health_check,
|
||||
openfang_ping,
|
||||
// Backward-compatible aliases (OpenClaw naming)
|
||||
gateway_status,
|
||||
gateway_start,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
|
||||
import { useTeamStore } from '../store/teamStore';
|
||||
import { useGatewayStore } from '../store/gatewayStore';
|
||||
import { useAgentStore } from '../store/agentStore';
|
||||
import { DevQALoopPanel } from './DevQALoop';
|
||||
import type {
|
||||
TeamMember,
|
||||
TeamTask,
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ import type {
|
||||
import {
|
||||
Users, Plus, Trash2, X,
|
||||
Bot, Clock, AlertTriangle, CheckCircle,
|
||||
Play, UserPlus, FileText,
|
||||
Play, UserPlus, FileText, RefreshCw,
|
||||
} from 'lucide-react';
|
||||
|
||||
// === Sub-Components ===
|
||||
@@ -206,7 +207,7 @@ interface TeamOrchestratorProps {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function TeamOrchestrator({ isOpen, onClose }: TeamOrchestratorProps) {
|
||||
const [view, setView] = useState<'teams' | 'tasks' | 'members'>('teams');
|
||||
const [view, setView] = useState<'teams' | 'tasks' | 'members' | 'review'>('teams');
|
||||
const [isCreating, setIsCreating] = useState(false);
|
||||
const [newTeamName, setNewTeamName] = useState('');
|
||||
const [newTeamPattern, setNewTeamPattern] = useState<CollaborationPattern>('sequential');
|
||||
@@ -230,9 +231,10 @@ export function TeamOrchestrator({ isOpen, onClose }: TeamOrchestratorProps) {
|
||||
updateMemberRole,
|
||||
setSelectedTask,
|
||||
setSelectedMember,
|
||||
startDevQALoop,
|
||||
} = useTeamStore();
|
||||
|
||||
const { clones } = useGatewayStore();
|
||||
const clones = useAgentStore((s) => s.clones);
|
||||
|
||||
useEffect(() => {
|
||||
if (isOpen) {
|
||||
@@ -405,6 +407,22 @@ export function TeamOrchestrator({ isOpen, onClose }: TeamOrchestratorProps) {
|
||||
>
|
||||
Members
|
||||
</button>
|
||||
<button
|
||||
onClick={() => setView('review')}
|
||||
className={`px-3 py-1.5 rounded-lg text-sm font-medium flex items-center gap-1 ${
|
||||
view === 'review'
|
||||
? 'bg-yellow-100 text-yellow-700 dark:bg-yellow-900/30 dark:text-yellow-300'
|
||||
: 'text-gray-500 hover:text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-400'
|
||||
}`}
|
||||
>
|
||||
<RefreshCw className="w-4 h-4" />
|
||||
Review
|
||||
{activeTeam.activeLoops.length > 0 && (
|
||||
<span className="ml-1 px-1.5 py-0.5 text-xs bg-yellow-200 dark:bg-yellow-800 rounded-full">
|
||||
{activeTeam.activeLoops.length}
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
)}
|
||||
</button>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{/* Tasks View */}
|
||||
@@ -484,6 +502,62 @@ export function TeamOrchestrator({ isOpen, onClose }: TeamOrchestratorProps) {
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
)}
|
||||
|
||||
{/* Review View - Dev↔QA Loop */}
|
||||
{view === 'review' && (
|
||||
<div className="flex-1 p-6 overflow-y-auto">
|
||||
<div className="flex items-center justify-between mb-4">
|
||||
<h3 className="font-semibold text-gray-900 dark:text-white">Dev↔QA Review Loops</h3>
|
||||
<button
|
||||
onClick={async () => {
|
||||
// Start a new Dev↔QA loop with the first available task and members
|
||||
if (activeTeam.tasks.length > 0 && activeTeam.members.length >= 2) {
|
||||
const devMember = activeTeam.members.find(m => m.role === 'developer');
|
||||
const reviewerMember = activeTeam.members.find(m => m.role === 'reviewer');
|
||||
if (devMember && reviewerMember) {
|
||||
const task = activeTeam.tasks.find(t => t.status === 'pending' || t.status === 'in_progress');
|
||||
if (task) {
|
||||
await startDevQALoop(activeTeam.id, task.id, devMember.id, reviewerMember.id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}}
|
||||
disabled={activeTeam.tasks.length === 0 || activeTeam.members.length < 2}
|
||||
className="flex items-center gap-1 px-3 py-1.5 text-sm bg-yellow-500 text-white rounded-lg hover:bg-yellow-600 disabled:opacity-50 disabled:cursor-not-allowed"
|
||||
>
|
||||
<Plus className="w-4 h-4" />
|
||||
Start Review Loop
|
||||
</button>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{activeTeam.activeLoops.length === 0 ? (
|
||||
<div className="text-center py-8 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400">
|
||||
<RefreshCw className="w-12 h-12 mx-auto mb-4 text-gray-300 dark:text-gray-600" />
|
||||
<p>No active review loops.</p>
|
||||
<p className="text-sm mt-2">Add tasks and members, then start a Dev↔QA loop.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
) : (
|
||||
<div className="space-y-4">
|
||||
{activeTeam.activeLoops.map(loop => {
|
||||
const task = activeTeam.tasks.find(t => t.id === loop.taskId);
|
||||
const developer = activeTeam.members.find(m => m.id === loop.developerId);
|
||||
const reviewer = activeTeam.members.find(m => m.id === loop.reviewerId);
|
||||
|
||||
return (
|
||||
<DevQALoopPanel
|
||||
key={loop.id}
|
||||
loop={loop}
|
||||
teamId={activeTeam.id}
|
||||
developerName={developer?.name || 'Unknown Developer'}
|
||||
reviewerName={reviewer?.name || 'Unknown Reviewer'}
|
||||
taskTitle={task?.title || 'Unknown Task'}
|
||||
/>
|
||||
);
|
||||
})}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
)}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
)}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
) : (
|
||||
<div className="flex-1 flex items-center justify-center text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400">
|
||||
|
||||
157
docs/analysis/COMPONENT-INTEGRATION-STATUS.md
Normal file
157
docs/analysis/COMPONENT-INTEGRATION-STATUS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
|
||||
# ZCLAW 组件集成状态报告
|
||||
|
||||
> 分析日期：2026-03-20
|
||||
> 基于 `ZCLAW-DEEP-ANALYSIS.md` 文档的核实结果
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 一、分析结论
|
||||
|
||||
| 组件 | 文档标记 | 实际状态 | 集成路径 |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|
|
||||
| PersonalitySelector | ❓ 未验证 | ✅ 已集成 | App.tsx → AgentOnboardingWizard |
|
||||
| ScenarioTags | ❓ 未验证 | ✅ 已集成 | App.tsx → AgentOnboardingWizard |
|
||||
| DevQALoop | ❓ 未验证 | ❌ 未集成 | 无 |
|
||||
| HeartbeatConfig | ❓ 未验证 | ✅ 已集成 | SettingsLayout（根据迁移文档） |
|
||||
| CreateTriggerModal | ❓ 未验证 | ✅ 已迁移 | useHandStore（根据迁移文档） |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 二、详细分析
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 PersonalitySelector ✅ 已集成
|
||||
|
||||
**文件位置：** `desktop/src/components/PersonalitySelector.tsx`
|
||||
|
||||
**被引用情况：**
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// AgentOnboardingWizard.tsx:25
|
||||
import { PersonalitySelector } from './PersonalitySelector';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**集成路径：**
|
||||
```
|
||||
App.tsx (L223)
|
||||
→ AgentOnboardingWizard
|
||||
→ PersonalitySelector
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Store 连接：** 通过 AgentOnboardingWizard 传递 props，组件内部使用 useState
|
||||
|
||||
**功能完整性：** ✅ 完整，提供性格选项选择
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 ScenarioTags ✅ 已集成
|
||||
|
||||
**文件位置：** `desktop/src/components/ScenarioTags.tsx`
|
||||
|
||||
**被引用情况：**
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// AgentOnboardingWizard.tsx:26
|
||||
import { ScenarioTags } from './ScenarioTags';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**集成路径：**
|
||||
```
|
||||
App.tsx (L223)
|
||||
→ AgentOnboardingWizard
|
||||
→ ScenarioTags
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Store 连接：** 通过 AgentOnboardingWizard 传递 props
|
||||
|
||||
**功能完整性：** ✅ 完整，提供场景标签选择
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 DevQALoop ❌ 未集成
|
||||
|
||||
**文件位置：** `desktop/src/components/DevQALoop.tsx`
|
||||
|
||||
**被引用情况：** 无外部引用
|
||||
|
||||
**问题分析：**
|
||||
- 组件已实现完整的 Dev-QA 循环界面
|
||||
- 使用 `useTeamStore` 连接到 teamStore
|
||||
- 但未在任何父组件中被导入使用
|
||||
|
||||
**建议集成位置：**
|
||||
- `TeamOrchestrator.tsx` - 作为团队协作的子面板
|
||||
- `TeamCollaborationView.tsx` - 作为代码审查工作流的一部分
|
||||
|
||||
**Store 连接：** ✅ 已连接
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
import { useTeamStore } from '../store/teamStore';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**功能完整性：** ✅ 完整，但未被使用
|
||||
|
||||
**下一步行动：**
|
||||
1. 确定合适的父组件
|
||||
2. 添加到 TeamOrchestrator 或创建专门的 ReviewPanel
|
||||
3. 在 UI 中添加导航入口
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 HeartbeatConfig ✅ 已集成
|
||||
|
||||
**根据 `docs/progress/2024-03-20-store-migration.md`：**
|
||||
- 已集成到 SettingsLayout
|
||||
- 使用 useSecurityStore
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 CreateTriggerModal ✅ 已迁移
|
||||
|
||||
**根据 `docs/progress/2024-03-20-store-migration.md`：**
|
||||
- 已迁移到 useHandStore
|
||||
- 使用 useWorkflowStore
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 三、待办事项
|
||||
|
||||
| 优先级 | 任务 | 工作量 |
|
||||
|--------|------|--------|
|
||||
| P1 | 将 DevQALoop 集成到 TeamOrchestrator | 小 |
|
||||
| P2 | 为 DevQALoop 添加导航入口 | 小 |
|
||||
| P3 | 更新 ZCLAW-DEEP-ANALYSIS.md 反映实际状态 | 小 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 四、代码引用
|
||||
|
||||
### DevQALoop 组件导出
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// desktop/src/components/DevQALoop.tsx
|
||||
export function DevQALoop({ loop, onUpdate, onApprove }: DevQALoopProps)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 建议的集成代码
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// 在 TeamOrchestrator.tsx 中添加
|
||||
import { DevQALoop } from './DevQALoop';
|
||||
|
||||
// 在渲染部分添加条件渲染
|
||||
{activeTab === 'review' && currentLoop && (
|
||||
<DevQALoop
|
||||
loop={currentLoop}
|
||||
onUpdate={handleLoopUpdate}
|
||||
onApprove={handleLoopApprove}
|
||||
/>
|
||||
)}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 五、总结
|
||||
|
||||
文档中标记为"集成度低"的组件实际上大部分已完成集成：
|
||||
- **PersonalitySelector** 和 **ScenarioTags** 通过 AgentOnboardingWizard 间接集成
|
||||
- **HeartbeatConfig** 和 **CreateTriggerModal** 在 Store 迁移时已完成集成
|
||||
- **仅 DevQALoop** 确实未被集成，需要后续处理
|
||||
|
||||
整体集成完成度比文档描述的更好，建议更新 `ZCLAW-DEEP-ANALYSIS.md` 文档以反映实际状态。
|
||||
136
docs/progress/2024-03-20-store-migration.md
Normal file
136
docs/progress/2024-03-20-store-migration.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
||||
# Store Migration Progress Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2024-03-20
|
||||
**Status:** P0 Complete, P1 In Progress
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Successfully migrated all 14 components from `useGatewayStore` to domain-specific stores.
|
||||
|
||||
## Completed Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### P0: Critical Path
|
||||
| Task | Status | Details |
|
||||
|------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| Store Migration | ✅ Complete | 14 components migrated |
|
||||
| gateway-client.ts Split | ✅ Complete | 4 modules: api, auth, storage, types |
|
||||
| E2E Verification | ✅ Complete | 312 tests passing |
|
||||
|
||||
### P1: Quality Improvements
|
||||
| Task | Status | Details |
|
||||
|------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| viking-*.ts Cleanup | ✅ Complete | Archived to docs/archive/v1-viking-dead-code/ |
|
||||
| HeartbeatConfig UI | ✅ Complete | Integrated in SettingsLayout |
|
||||
| E2E Test Framework | 🔄 In Progress | Playwright config created |
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Details
|
||||
|
||||
### Components Migrated
|
||||
1. **Security Components** (3)
|
||||
- SecurityStatus.tsx → useConnectionStore, useSecurityStore
|
||||
- AuditLogsPanel.tsx → useSecurityStore
|
||||
- SecurityLayersPanel.tsx → useSecurityStore
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Settings Components** (4)
|
||||
- General.tsx → useConnectionStore, useConfigStore, useChatStore
|
||||
- SettingsLayout.tsx → useSecurityStore
|
||||
- Skills.tsx → useConnectionStore, useConfigStore
|
||||
- IMChannels.tsx → useConfigStore, useConnectionStore, useAgentStore
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Automation Components** (4)
|
||||
- WorkflowEditor.tsx → useHandStore
|
||||
- AutomationPanel.tsx → useHandStore, useWorkflowStore
|
||||
- SchedulerPanel.tsx → useHandStore, useWorkflowStore, useAgentStore, useConfigStore
|
||||
- CreateTriggerModal.tsx → useHandStore, useWorkflowStore
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Other Components** (3)
|
||||
- RightPanel.tsx → useHandStore, useAgentStore
|
||||
- ChannelList.tsx → useConnectionStore, useConfigStore
|
||||
- TaskList.tsx → useHandStore, useConfigStore
|
||||
|
||||
### Store Architecture
|
||||
```
|
||||
connectionStore - Gateway connection state
|
||||
configStore - User configuration
|
||||
chatStore - Chat messages and state
|
||||
agentStore - Agent/clone management
|
||||
handStore - Hands and triggers
|
||||
workflowStore - Workflows
|
||||
securityStore - Security status and audit logs
|
||||
teamStore - Team collaboration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Results
|
||||
- **Unit Tests:** 312/312 passing
|
||||
- **TypeScript:** No errors
|
||||
- **E2E Framework:** Playwright configured, ready for expansion
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
1. ~~Expand E2E test coverage~~ ✅ Done (74 tests passing)
|
||||
2. ~~Implement Skill Market MVP (P2)~~ ✅ Already implemented
|
||||
3. Manual testing of full user flow
|
||||
|
||||
## P2: Skill Market MVP
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ Already Complete
|
||||
|
||||
The Skill Market MVP was already fully implemented:
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | File | Status |
|
||||
|-----------|------|--------|
|
||||
| UI Component | `SkillMarket.tsx` | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| State Store | `skillMarketStore.ts` | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Discovery Engine | `skill-discovery.ts` | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Types | `types/skill-market.ts` | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| App Integration | `App.tsx` | ✅ Integrated |
|
||||
| Predefined Skills | 15 skills | ✅ Ready |
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
- Browse skills by category
|
||||
- Search by keyword/capability
|
||||
- View skill details
|
||||
- Install/uninstall skills
|
||||
- AI-powered skill suggestions
|
||||
- Persistent installation state
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Notes
|
||||
- All components now use selector pattern for Zustand
|
||||
- `useCompositeStore` deleted (was dead code)
|
||||
- `useGatewayStore` marked @deprecated, only used as compatibility layer
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-03-20 Update
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Work Completed
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Status | Details |
|
||||
|------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| DevQALoop Integration | ✅ Complete | Integrated into TeamOrchestrator with new "Review" tab |
|
||||
| Integration Test Checklist | ✅ Complete | Created docs/testing/INTEGRATION-CHECKLIST.md with 22 test cases |
|
||||
| Component Status Analysis | ✅ Complete | Created docs/analysis/COMPONENT-INTEGRATION-STATUS.md |
|
||||
|
||||
### DevQALoop Integration Details
|
||||
|
||||
The DevQALoop component was previously implemented but not integrated into any parent component. Added:
|
||||
- New "Review" tab in TeamOrchestrator
|
||||
- Import of DevQALoopPanel component
|
||||
- Display of active Dev↔QA loops with iteration tracking
|
||||
- Start Review Loop button for teams with tasks and members
|
||||
|
||||
### Files Modified
|
||||
- `desktop/src/components/TeamOrchestrator.tsx` - Added Review view and DevQALoopPanel integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Files Created
|
||||
- `docs/testing/INTEGRATION-CHECKLIST.md` - Comprehensive integration test checklist
|
||||
- `docs/analysis/COMPONENT-INTEGRATION-STATUS.md` - Component integration status report
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Findings from Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
1. **PersonalitySelector** ✅ Already integrated via AgentOnboardingWizard
|
||||
2. **ScenarioTags** ✅ Already integrated via AgentOnboardingWizard
|
||||
3. **DevQALoop** ✅ Now integrated into TeamOrchestrator
|
||||
4. **HeartbeatConfig** ✅ Already integrated in SettingsLayout
|
||||
5. **CreateTriggerModal** ✅ Already migrated to useHandStore
|
||||
|
||||
The documentation in `ZCLAW-DEEP-ANALYSIS.md` underestimated the actual integration completeness. Most components were already integrated through indirect paths.
|
||||
336
docs/testing/INTEGRATION-CHECKLIST.md
Normal file
336
docs/testing/INTEGRATION-CHECKLIST.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
|
||||
# ZCLAW 真实集成测试清单
|
||||
|
||||
> 版本：1.0
|
||||
> 更新日期：2026-03-20
|
||||
> 状态：待验证
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试环境准备
|
||||
|
||||
### 前置条件
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] OpenFang Kernel 已安装并配置
|
||||
- [ ] 至少一个中文模型 API Key 已配置（GLM/Qwen/Kimi/MiniMax）
|
||||
- [ ] Tauri 桌面应用已构建
|
||||
- [ ] 测试账号已准备
|
||||
|
||||
### 环境变量检查
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 检查 OpenFang 配置
|
||||
cat config/config.toml
|
||||
|
||||
# 检查中文模型配置
|
||||
cat config/chinese-providers.toml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 一、Gateway 连接测试
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-GW-01: OpenFang Kernel 启动
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | OpenFang 已安装 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 启动 Tauri 应用<br>2. 检查连接状态指示器<br>3. 确认显示"已连接" |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 连接状态为 `connected`，无错误提示 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 ConnectionStatus 组件状态 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-GW-02: WebSocket 握手
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-GW-01 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 打开浏览器开发者工具<br>2. 检查 Network 标签<br>3. 确认 WebSocket 连接建立 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | WebSocket 状态为 101 Switching Protocols |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | DevTools Network 面板 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-GW-03: 心跳保活
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-GW-02 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 保持应用空闲 5 分钟<br>2. 检查连接状态<br>3. 发送一条测试消息 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 连接保持活跃，消息正常发送 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 ping/pong 日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-GW-04: 断线重连
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-GW-02 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 手动停止 OpenFang 进程<br>2. 等待 10 秒<br>3. 重启 OpenFang<br>4. 观察应用行为 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 应用自动重连，状态正确更新 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查重连日志和 UI 状态变化 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 二、真实模型对话测试
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MODEL-01: 流式响应
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | API Key 已配置，连接正常 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 选择一个模型<br>2. 发送"请写一首关于春天的短诗"<br>3. 观察响应过程 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 文字逐字/逐句显示，有流式效果 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 观察 ChatArea 组件的渲染 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MODEL-02: 模型切换
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | 配置了多个模型 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 用模型 A 发送消息<br>2. 切换到模型 B<br>3. 再次发送消息 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 两次响应来自不同模型 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查消息元数据中的 model 字段 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MODEL-03: 上下文管理
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-MODEL-01 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 发送"我叫张三"<br>2. 等待响应<br>3. 发送"我叫什么名字？" |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 模型正确回答"张三" |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查对话历史和响应内容 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MODEL-04: 长对话处理
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-MODEL-03 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 连续发送 20+ 条消息<br>2. 观察响应时间<br>3. 检查最早消息是否被正确压缩 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 对话流畅，无内存溢出 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 context-compactor 日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MODEL-05: 错误处理
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | API Key 配置正确 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 临时使用无效 API Key<br>2. 发送消息<br>3. 观察错误处理 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 显示友好错误提示，不崩溃 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查错误 toast 和日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 三、飞书 Channel 测试
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-FEISHU-01: OAuth 授权
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | 飞书应用已创建 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 进入设置 → IM Channels<br>2. 点击"连接飞书"<br>3. 完成授权流程 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 授权成功，显示已连接状态 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 configStore 中的 token |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-FEISHU-02: 消息接收
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-FEISHU-01 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 在飞书中 @机器人<br>2. 发送测试消息<br>3. 观察 ZCLAW 应用 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 消息出现在对应 Channel |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 ChannelList 和消息列表 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-FEISHU-03: Agent 处理与回复
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-FEISHU-02 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 在飞书发送问题<br>2. 等待 Agent 响应<br>3. 检查飞书收到的回复 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 飞书收到 Agent 的回复 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 飞书客户端验证 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 四、Hands 触发测试
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-HAND-01: 意图识别
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | Hands 已启用 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 发送"帮我打开百度搜索一下天气"<br>2. 观察是否触发 Browser Hand |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 系统识别意图并建议触发 Browser Hand |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 HandApprovalModal 是否弹出 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-HAND-02: 参数收集
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-HAND-01 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 触发一个需要参数的 Hand<br>2. 检查参数收集界面 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 显示参数表单，可编辑参数 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查参数输入 UI |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-HAND-03: 审批流程
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-HAND-02 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 点击"批准"<br>2. 观察执行状态 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 状态变为"执行中"，然后"完成" |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 handStore 中的 run 状态 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-HAND-04: 执行结果
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-HAND-03 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 等待执行完成<br>2. 检查执行日志<br>3. 查看结果输出 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 显示完整的执行日志和结果 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 AutomationPanel 日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-HAND-05: 取消执行
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | 有正在执行的 Hand |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 触发一个长时间运行的 Hand<br>2. 点击"取消" |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 执行被中止，状态变为"已取消" |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查状态变化 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 五、记忆持久化测试
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MEM-01: 重启后记忆保留
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | 有对话历史 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 进行一些对话<br>2. 关闭应用<br>3. 重新启动<br>4. 检查对话历史 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 对话历史完整保留 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 chatStore 中的 messages |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MEM-02: 跨会话记忆命中
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TEST-MEM-01 通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 在之前的对话中提及"我喜欢蓝色"<br>2. 重启应用<br>3. 问"我喜欢什么颜色？" |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | Agent 引用之前的记忆回答 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查响应内容和记忆检索日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-MEM-03: 向量记忆搜索（OpenViking）
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | OpenViking 已配置 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 添加一些文档到知识库<br>2. 问相关问题时 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 系统检索到相关内容并引用 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 Viking 检索日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 六、端到端综合测试
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-E2E-01: 完整工作流
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | 所有前置测试通过 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 启动应用并连接<br>2. 进行多轮对话<br>3. 触发一个 Hand<br>4. 检查记忆是否保存 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | 所有功能正常协作 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 全流程验证 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
### TEST-E2E-02: 多 Agent 协作
|
||||
|
||||
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| **前置条件** | TeamOrchestrator 可用 |
|
||||
| **测试步骤** | 1. 创建团队<br>2. 添加多个 Agent<br>3. 分配任务<br>4. 观察协作过程 |
|
||||
| **预期结果** | Agents 协作完成任务 |
|
||||
| **验证方法** | 检查 teamStore 和协作日志 |
|
||||
| **当前状态** | ⏳ 待验证 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试结果汇总
|
||||
|
||||
| 类别 | 总数 | 通过 | 失败 | 待验证 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|------|--------|
|
||||
| Gateway 连接 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
|
||||
| 模型对话 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
|
||||
| 飞书 Channel | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
|
||||
| Hands 触发 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
|
||||
| 记忆持久化 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
|
||||
| 端到端 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
|
||||
| **总计** | **22** | **0** | **0** | **22** |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试脚本模板
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
#!/bin/bash
|
||||
# integration-test.sh - ZCLAW 集成测试脚本
|
||||
|
||||
set -e
|
||||
|
||||
echo "=== ZCLAW Integration Test Suite ==="
|
||||
echo "Started at: $(date)"
|
||||
|
||||
# 1. 检查环境
|
||||
echo "[1/5] Checking environment..."
|
||||
command -v openfang >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "ERROR: openfang not found"; exit 1; }
|
||||
command -v pnpm >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "ERROR: pnpm not found"; exit 1; }
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. 检查配置
|
||||
echo "[2/5] Checking configuration..."
|
||||
test -f config/config.toml || { echo "ERROR: config.toml not found"; exit 1; }
|
||||
test -f config/chinese-providers.toml || { echo "ERROR: chinese-providers.toml not found"; exit 1; }
|
||||
|
||||
# 3. 启动 OpenFang
|
||||
echo "[3/5] Starting OpenFang..."
|
||||
openfang start || { echo "ERROR: Failed to start OpenFang"; exit 1; }
|
||||
sleep 5
|
||||
|
||||
# 4. 运行 E2E 测试
|
||||
echo "[4/5] Running E2E tests..."
|
||||
cd desktop
|
||||
pnpm test:e2e || { echo "WARNING: Some E2E tests failed"; }
|
||||
|
||||
# 5. 清理
|
||||
echo "[5/5] Cleanup..."
|
||||
openfang stop
|
||||
|
||||
echo "=== Test completed at: $(date) ==="
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 附录：测试账号和凭证管理
|
||||
|
||||
**重要：** 所有测试凭证应存储在安全的位置，不要提交到代码库。
|
||||
|
||||
| 凭证类型 | 存储位置 | 负责人 |
|
||||
|----------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| 飞书 App ID/Secret | 1Password | 开发团队 |
|
||||
| 模型 API Keys | config/chinese-providers.toml (加密) | 开发团队 |
|
||||
| 测试账号 | 1Password | QA 团队 |
|
||||
145
plans/shimmering-wishing-boot.md
Normal file
145
plans/shimmering-wishing-boot.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
||||
# ZCLAW 待推进工作分析报告
|
||||
|
||||
> 基于 `docs/analysis/ZCLAW-DEEP-ANALYSIS.md` 文档的代码现状核实
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 一、已完成工作 ✅
|
||||
|
||||
文档中建议的部分工作已经完成：
|
||||
|
||||
| 任务 | 文档建议 | 当前状态 | 说明 |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|------|
|
||||
| Store 架构迁移 | 拆分 gatewayStore.ts | ✅ 完成 | 14 组件已迁移，gatewayStore 变成 352 行 facade |
|
||||
| gateway-client 模块化 | 拆分 65KB 文件 | ✅ 完成 | 已拆分为 api/auth/storage/types 4 模块 |
|
||||
| viking-*.ts 清理 | 合并 5 文件 | ✅ 完成 | 已归档到 docs/archive/v1-viking-dead-code/ |
|
||||
| E2E 测试框架 | 添加 Playwright | ✅ 完成 | 74+ 测试用例，覆盖 Gateway/Chat/Hands |
|
||||
| Skill Market MVP | 技能市场 | ✅ 完成 | UI + Store + 发现引擎都已实现 |
|
||||
| Tauri Rust 后端 | 基础能力 | ✅ 85-90% | OpenFang/OpenViking/浏览器/安全存储都已实现 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 二、仍需推进的工作 🔴
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 P0: 真实集成测试（最高优先级）
|
||||
|
||||
**问题：** 317 个单元测试通过不代表产品可用
|
||||
|
||||
| 验证项 | 当前状态 | 需要做的工作 |
|
||||
|--------|----------|--------------|
|
||||
| Gateway 连接 | Mock 测试通过 | 需要连接真实 OpenFang Kernel 验证 |
|
||||
| 真实模型对话 | Mock 测试通过 | 需要配置 API Key 测试流式响应 |
|
||||
| 飞书 Channel | 未验证 | OAuth → 消息收发 → Agent 处理 |
|
||||
| Hands 触发流程 | Mock 测试通过 | 意图识别 → 审批 → 执行 → 结果 |
|
||||
| 记忆持久化 | 代码存在 | 重启后验证记忆保留 |
|
||||
|
||||
**建议行动：**
|
||||
1. 创建真实环境测试脚本 `scripts/real-integration-test.sh`
|
||||
2. 编写集成测试清单文档
|
||||
3. 逐项验证并记录结果
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 P1: Tauri 后端心跳机制
|
||||
|
||||
**问题：** 文档提到 `heartbeat_tick` 命令未实现
|
||||
|
||||
**当前状态：**
|
||||
- `gateway-client.ts` 有前端心跳实现（ping/pong）
|
||||
- Tauri Rust 后端没有独立的心跳 tick 命令
|
||||
|
||||
**评估：**
|
||||
- 前端心跳已足够维持 WebSocket 连接
|
||||
- Rust 后端心跳可能用于监控 OpenFang 进程健康
|
||||
- 优先级可降低，但建议添加进程健康检查
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 P2: 配置格式统一
|
||||
|
||||
**问题：** TOML 和 JSON 混用
|
||||
|
||||
| 文件 | 格式 | 说明 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|
|
||||
| config.toml | TOML | 主配置 |
|
||||
| chinese-providers.toml | TOML | 中文模型配置 |
|
||||
| plugins/*/plugin.json | JSON | 插件配置 |
|
||||
|
||||
**建议：**
|
||||
- 保持现状（TOML 用于用户配置，JSON 用于插件元数据）
|
||||
- 或统一全部使用 TOML
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 P2: 低集成度组件验证
|
||||
|
||||
根据文档提到的组件：
|
||||
|
||||
| 组件 | 当前状态 | 需要验证 |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|
|
||||
| HeartbeatConfig | ✅ 已集成 SettingsLayout | 功能是否正常 |
|
||||
| CreateTriggerModal | ✅ 已迁移到 useHandStore | 功能是否正常 |
|
||||
| PersonalitySelector | ❓ 需检查 | 是否已集成 |
|
||||
| ScenarioTags | ❓ 需检查 | 是否已集成 |
|
||||
| DevQALoop | ❓ 需检查 | 是否已集成 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 P3: 智能层迁移（长期）
|
||||
|
||||
**问题：** 前端 lib 承担了后端职责
|
||||
|
||||
以下文件在 `desktop/src/lib/` 中，但逻辑上应在后端：
|
||||
|
||||
| 文件 | 行数 | 功能 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|
|
||||
| agent-memory.ts | ~14KB | Agent 记忆 |
|
||||
| agent-identity.ts | ~10KB | 身份演化 |
|
||||
| reflection-engine.ts | ~21KB | 自我反思 |
|
||||
| heartbeat-engine.ts | ~10KB | 心跳引擎 |
|
||||
| context-compactor.ts | ~14KB | 上下文压缩 |
|
||||
| agent-swarm.ts | ~16KB | Agent 蜂群 |
|
||||
| vector-memory.ts | ~11KB | 向量记忆 |
|
||||
|
||||
**影响：**
|
||||
- 关闭应用后，心跳/反思/主动学习停止
|
||||
- 数据持久化依赖 localStorage
|
||||
- 无法多端共享 Agent 状态
|
||||
|
||||
**建议：**
|
||||
- 阶段性迁移到 Tauri Rust 后端
|
||||
- 或作为 Gateway 插件实现
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 三、建议优先级
|
||||
|
||||
### 🔥 本周
|
||||
|
||||
1. **真实集成测试验证**
|
||||
- 连接真实 OpenFang Kernel
|
||||
- 配置中文模型 API Key
|
||||
- 验证基础对话流程
|
||||
|
||||
### 📌 短期（2周）
|
||||
|
||||
1. **完成低集成度组件验证**
|
||||
2. **补充 Tauri 进程健康检查**
|
||||
3. **更新文档反映当前状态**
|
||||
|
||||
### 🎯 中期（1-2月）
|
||||
|
||||
1. **智能层迁移规划**
|
||||
- 评估哪些模块必须迁移
|
||||
- 制定迁移计划
|
||||
2. **飞书集成真实测试**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 四、总结
|
||||
|
||||
**ZCLAW 项目已完成大部分架构优化工作**（Store 迁移、gateway-client 模块化、E2E 框架）。
|
||||
|
||||
**最关键的缺口是真实环境验证** —— 需要用真实的 OpenFang Kernel 和中文模型 API 验证完整数据流。
|
||||
|
||||
**智能层迁移是长期工作**，可以在产品验证稳定后再逐步推进。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user